Costa Rica vs El Salvador: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Costa Rica
16.1%
in 2022
El Salvador
17.4%
in 2022
Costa Rica rank
22nd
El Salvador rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Costa Rica
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 17.4% against 16.1% in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 22nd and El Salvador ranks 21st of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.4% | 37.9% | 4.5% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 21.1% | 34.4% | 13.3% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 20.0% | 16.7% | 3.4% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Costa Rica or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 17.4% against 16.1% in Costa Rica as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 1.3%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Costa Rica and El Salvador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Costa Rica ranks 22nd and El Salvador ranks 21st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group