Dominican Republic vs Türkiye: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Dominican Republic
21.9%
in 2021
Türkiye
18.3%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
10th
Türkiye rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Dominican Republic
- Türkiye
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 21.9% against 18.3% in Türkiye, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.2 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Türkiye ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 10th and Türkiye ranks 13th of 31 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.3% | 16.2% | 0.1% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 17.2% | 15.8% | 1.4% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers, Dominican Republic or Türkiye?
- Dominican Republic, at 21.9% against 18.3% in Türkiye as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers between Dominican Republic and Türkiye?
- 3.6%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Türkiye?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Türkiye rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Dominican Republic ranks 10th and Türkiye ranks 13th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group