Dominican Republic vs Romania: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Dominican Republic
20.7%
in 2021
Romania
31.0%
in 2021
Dominican Republic rank
10th
Romania rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Dominican Republic
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 31.0% against 20.7% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 10.3%.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.5 times Dominican Republic's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 10th and Romania ranks 7th of 30 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.6% | 25.8% | 8.2% | Romania |
| 2010s | 17.8% | 31.8% | 13.9% | Romania |
| 2020s | 20.7% | 31.0% | 10.3% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers, Dominican Republic or Romania?
- Romania, at 31.0% against 20.7% in Dominican Republic as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers between Dominican Republic and Romania?
- 10.3%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Romania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Romania rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Dominican Republic ranks 10th and Romania ranks 7th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group