Brazil vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Brazil
45.3%
in 2022
Mongolia
50.4%
in 2020
Brazil rank
12th
Mongolia rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 50.4% against 45.3% in Brazil, a difference of 5.1%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 10th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.5% | 29.6% | 19.9% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 47.7% | 33.2% | 14.5% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 47.7% | 50.4% | 2.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 50.4% against 45.3% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 5.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Brazil ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 10th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group