Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Brazil
45.3%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
43.2%
in 2020
Brazil rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 45.3% against 43.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.6% | 31.5% | 19.1% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 47.5% | 42.5% | 5.1% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 47.7% | 43.2% | 4.4% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Brazil, at 45.3% against 43.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.1%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Brazil ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group