Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Mongolia
48.4%
in 2020
Uruguay
49.8%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
11th
Uruguay rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 49.8% against 48.4% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.4%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 9th of 34 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.5% | 45.8% | 17.3% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 29.8% | 44.9% | 15.1% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 48.4% | 51.4% | 3.0% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 49.8% against 48.4% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 1.4%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Mongolia ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 9th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group