Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Kazakhstan
65.7%
in 2021
Serbia
59.1%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
4th
Serbia rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 65.7% against 59.1% in Serbia, a difference of 6.6%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 7th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.0% | 57.4% | 45.3% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 55.2% | 67.7% | 12.5% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 65.7% | 65.6% | 0.1% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Kazakhstan, at 65.7% against 59.1% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6.6%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Kazakhstan ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 7th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group