Brazil vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Brazil
43.9%
in 2022
Mongolia
48.4%
in 2020
Brazil rank
14th
Mongolia rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 48.4% against 43.9% in Brazil, a difference of 4.5%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 11th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.4% | 28.5% | 19.9% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 45.8% | 31.7% | 14.1% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 45.7% | 48.4% | 2.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 48.4% against 43.9% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 4.5%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Brazil ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 11th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group