Belarus vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Belarus
59.8%
in 2019
Uruguay
49.8%
in 2022
Belarus rank
6th
Uruguay rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Belarus
- Uruguay
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 59.8% against 49.8% in Uruguay, a difference of 10.0%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 9th of 34 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.2% | 45.3% | 0.9% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 56.5% | 50.8% | 5.7% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Belarus or Uruguay?
- Belarus, at 59.8% against 49.8% in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Belarus and Uruguay?
- 10.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Belarus ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 9th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group