Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Mongolia
58.0%
in 2020
Uruguay
55.4%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
7th
Uruguay rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 58.0% against 55.4% in Uruguay, a difference of 2.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Uruguay ahead.
Mongolia ranks 7th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.5% | 36.5% | 7.0% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 35.8% | 43.4% | 7.5% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 58.0% | 57.8% | 0.2% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Mongolia, at 58.0% against 55.4% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 2.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 7th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group