Mongolia vs Turkey: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Mongolia
58.0%
in 2020
Turkey
52.1%
in 2013
Mongolia rank
7th
Turkey rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Turkey
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 58.0% against 52.1% in Turkey, a difference of 5.9%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Turkey's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Turkey has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 7th and Turkey ranks 9th of 31 countries.
Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.1% | 49.7% | 20.6% | Turkey |
| 2010s | 26.5% | 49.8% | 23.2% | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Mongolia or Turkey?
- Mongolia, at 58.0% against 52.1% in Turkey as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Mongolia and Turkey?
- 5.9%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Turkey?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2012.
- How do Mongolia and Turkey rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 7th and Turkey ranks 9th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group