Colombia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Colombia
51.8%
in 2022
Mongolia
58.0%
in 2020
Colombia rank
10th
Mongolia rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Colombia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 58.0% against 51.8% in Colombia, a difference of 6.2%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 7th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 45.6% | 35.7% | 9.9% | Colombia |
| 2020s | 56.9% | 58.0% | 1.1% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Colombia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 58.0% against 51.8% in Colombia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Colombia and Mongolia?
- 6.2%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Colombia ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 7th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group