Honduras vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Honduras
37.7%
in 2019
Mongolia
39.9%
in 2020
Honduras rank
18th
Mongolia rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Honduras
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 39.9% against 37.7% in Honduras, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.7% | 25.5% | 2.2% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 32.8% | 26.2% | 6.6% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance, Honduras or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 39.9% against 37.7% in Honduras as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance between Honduras and Mongolia?
- 2.2%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Honduras and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Honduras ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group