Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash
Costa Rica
13.3%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
13.9%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
13th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 13.9% against 13.3% in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 24 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.6% | 12.6% | 0.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 31.7% | 13.9% | 17.7% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 13.9% against 13.3% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Costa Rica ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group