Honduras vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private
Honduras
27.5%
in 2019
Mongolia
42.2%
in 2020
Honduras rank
16th
Mongolia rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Honduras
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 42.2% against 27.5% in Honduras, a difference of 14.7%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.5 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Honduras ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 27 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.6% | 46.2% | 40.6% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 30.3% | 30.7% | 0.5% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private, Honduras or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 42.2% against 27.5% in Honduras as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private between Honduras and Mongolia?
- 14.7%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Honduras and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
- Honduras ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group