Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private
Armenia
114.3%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
89.0%
in 2020
Armenia rank
2nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 114.3% against 89.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 25.3%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 80.5% | 80.4% | 0.2% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 92.1% | 89.0% | 3.1% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Armenia, at 114.3% against 89.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 25.3%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group