Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private
Kosovo
70.7%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
93.9%
in 2020
Kosovo rank
4th
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 93.9% against 70.7% in Kosovo, a difference of 23.2%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Kosovo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 4th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kosovo averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.5% | 50.5% | 25.0% | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 58.2% | 63.8% | 5.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 93.9% against 70.7% in Kosovo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 23.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
- Kosovo ranks 4th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group