Chile vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private
Chile
13.9%
in 2022
Peru
14.4%
in 2022
Chile rank
24th
Peru rank
23rd
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Chile
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 14.4% against 13.9% in Chile, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 24th and Peru ranks 23rd of 27 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.2% | 13.1% | 18.0% | Chile |
| 2020s | 16.3% | 15.5% | 0.8% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private, Chile or Peru?
- Peru, at 14.4% against 13.9% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private between Chile and Peru?
- 0.5%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
- Chile ranks 24th and Peru ranks 23rd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group