Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private
Armenia
137.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
93.9%
in 2020
Armenia rank
2nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 137.6% against 93.9% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 43.7%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.5 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 75.9% | 76.4% | 0.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 89.5% | 93.9% | 4.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Armenia, at 137.6% against 93.9% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 43.7%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group