Kyrgyzstan vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Kyrgyzstan
40.1%
in 2020
Uruguay
37.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Uruguay rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 40.1% against 37.6% in Uruguay, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Uruguay ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 16th of 36 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 42.2% | 47.7% | 5.5% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 40.1% | 52.1% | 12.0% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Kyrgyzstan or Uruguay?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 40.1% against 37.6% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 2.5%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 16th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group