Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Costa Rica
30.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
40.1%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
17th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 40.1% against 30.5% in Costa Rica, a difference of 9.6%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Costa Rica's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 36 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24.3% | 41.7% | 17.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 37.6% | 40.1% | 2.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 40.1% against 30.5% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Costa Rica ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group