Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Mongolia
46.4%
in 2020
Viet Nam
41.8%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
16th
Viet Nam rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 46.4% against 41.8% in Viet Nam, a difference of 4.6%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Mongolia ranks 16th and Viet Nam ranks 18th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 33.8% | 43.3% | 9.6% | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 46.4% | 41.8% | 4.6% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Mongolia, at 46.4% against 41.8% in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 4.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Mongolia ranks 16th and Viet Nam ranks 18th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group