Kyrgyzstan vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Kyrgyzstan
43.3%
in 2020
Uruguay
49.0%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
17th
Uruguay rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 49.0% against 43.3% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 5.7%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Uruguay ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Uruguay ranks 14th of 34 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 44.0% | 52.6% | 8.6% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 43.3% | 51.5% | 8.2% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Kyrgyzstan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 49.0% against 43.3% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 5.7%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Uruguay ranks 14th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group