Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Kazakhstan
55.2%
in 2021
Serbia
60.8%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
9th
Serbia rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 60.8% against 55.2% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 5.6%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 6th of 34 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.0% | 50.7% | 38.7% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 46.6% | 62.2% | 15.6% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 55.2% | 64.7% | 9.5% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 60.8% against 55.2% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 5.6%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Kazakhstan ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 6th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group