Honduras vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Honduras
47.1%
in 2019
Mongolia
46.4%
in 2020
Honduras rank
15th
Mongolia rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Honduras
- Mongolia
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 47.1% against 46.4% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Honduras ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.5% | 34.4% | 11.0% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 34.1% | 36.1% | 2.0% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Honduras or Mongolia?
- Honduras, at 47.1% against 46.4% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Honduras and Mongolia?
- 0.7%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Honduras and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Honduras ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group