Honduras vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Honduras
47.1%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
43.3%
in 2020
Honduras rank
15th
Kyrgyzstan rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Honduras
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 47.1% against 43.3% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 3.8%.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Honduras or Kyrgyzstan?
- Honduras, at 47.1% against 43.3% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Honduras and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.8%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Kyrgyzstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Honduras and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Honduras ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group