Chile vs Panama: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Chile
35.4%
in 2022
Panama
30.0%
in 2023
Chile rank
25th
Panama rank
28th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Chile
- Panama
How they compare
Chile currently reports 35.4% against 30.0% in Panama, a difference of 5.4%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 25th and Panama ranks 28th of 34 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.7% | 35.4% | 0.7% | Panama |
| 2010s | 29.2% | 32.2% | 3.0% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Chile or Panama?
- Chile, at 35.4% against 30.0% in Panama as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Chile and Panama?
- 5.4%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Panama rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Chile ranks 25th and Panama ranks 28th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group