Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Brazil
51.4%
in 2022
Sri Lanka
51.3%
in 2019
Brazil rank
11th
Sri Lanka rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Brazil
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 51.4% against 51.3% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 11th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 34 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.5% | 47.5% | 7.0% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 54.5% | 50.2% | 4.3% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
- Brazil, at 51.4% against 51.3% in Sri Lanka as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Brazil ranks 11th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group