Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Mongolia
41.5%
in 2020
Uruguay
48.3%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
16th
Uruguay rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 48.3% against 41.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 6.8%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 16th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 34 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.9% | 44.2% | 13.3% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 32.5% | 44.8% | 12.3% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 41.5% | 51.1% | 9.6% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 48.3% against 41.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 6.8%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Mongolia ranks 16th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group