Moldova vs Turkey: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Moldova
63.0%
in 2018
Turkey
56.9%
in 2019
Moldova rank
8th
Turkey rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Moldova
- Turkey
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 63.0% against 56.9% in Turkey, a difference of 6.1%.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Turkey's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Turkey ahead.
Moldova ranks 8th and Turkey ranks 9th of 34 countries.
Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Moldova or Turkey?
- Moldova, at 63.0% against 56.9% in Turkey as of 2018.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Moldova and Turkey?
- 6.1%, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Turkey?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Moldova and Turkey rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Moldova ranks 8th and Turkey ranks 9th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group