Colombia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Colombia
46.5%
in 2022
Mongolia
41.5%
in 2020
Colombia rank
14th
Mongolia rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Colombia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 46.5% against 41.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 37.0% | 32.2% | 4.8% | Colombia |
| 2020s | 55.4% | 41.5% | 13.9% | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Colombia or Mongolia?
- Colombia, at 46.5% against 41.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Colombia and Mongolia?
- 5.0%, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Colombia ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group