Bolivia vs Sri Lanka: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Bolivia
39.6%
in 2021
Sri Lanka
39.9%
in 2019
Bolivia rank
19th
Sri Lanka rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Bolivia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 39.9% against 39.6% in Bolivia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 19th and Sri Lanka ranks 17th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.5% | 38.1% | 4.4% | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 39.4% | 41.2% | 1.7% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Bolivia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 39.9% against 39.6% in Bolivia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Bolivia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.3%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Sri Lanka rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Bolivia ranks 19th and Sri Lanka ranks 17th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group