Bolivia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Bolivia
39.6%
in 2021
Mongolia
41.5%
in 2020
Bolivia rank
19th
Mongolia rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Bolivia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 41.5% against 39.6% in Bolivia, a difference of 1.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.6% | 30.0% | 18.5% | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 38.4% | 33.6% | 4.8% | Bolivia |
| 2020s | 45.8% | 41.5% | 4.3% | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Bolivia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 41.5% against 39.6% in Bolivia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Bolivia and Mongolia?
- 1.9%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Bolivia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Bolivia ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group