Armenia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Armenia
45.7%
in 2022
Mongolia
41.5%
in 2020
Armenia rank
15th
Mongolia rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Armenia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 45.7% against 41.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 4.2%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.3% | 30.9% | 7.4% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 38.2% | 32.2% | 6.0% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 55.3% | 41.5% | 13.8% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Armenia or Mongolia?
- Armenia, at 45.7% against 41.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Armenia and Mongolia?
- 4.2%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Armenia ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group