Panama vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Panama
35.9%
in 2023
Peru
34.3%
in 2022
Panama rank
23rd
Peru rank
24th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Panama
- Peru
How they compare
Panama currently reports 35.9% against 34.3% in Peru, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 24th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.6% | 42.6% | 1.0% | Peru |
| 2010s | 32.8% | 41.2% | 8.4% | Peru |
| 2020s | 34.7% | 33.7% | 1.0% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Panama or Peru?
- Panama, at 35.9% against 34.3% in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Panama and Peru?
- 1.6%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Panama and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Panama ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 24th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group