Mongolia vs Turkey: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Mongolia
53.4%
in 2020
Turkey
53.8%
in 2013
Mongolia rank
12th
Turkey rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports 53.8% against 53.4% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Turkey has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 12th and Turkey ranks 11th of 31 countries.
Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.0% | 53.9% | 20.9% | Turkey |
| 2010s | 29.7% | 53.6% | 23.9% | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Mongolia or Turkey?
- Turkey, at 53.8% against 53.4% in Mongolia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Mongolia and Turkey?
- 0.4%, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Turkey?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2012.
- How do Mongolia and Turkey rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 12th and Turkey ranks 11th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group