Mexico vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Mexico
27.9%
in 2022
Peru
34.3%
in 2022
Mexico rank
27th
Peru rank
24th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Mexico
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 34.3% against 27.9% in Mexico, a difference of 6.4%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Peru ahead.
Mexico ranks 27th and Peru ranks 24th of 31 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.2% | 34.7% | 2.4% | Peru |
| 2010s | 31.0% | 42.2% | 11.2% | Peru |
| 2020s | 29.0% | 34.5% | 5.6% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Mexico or Peru?
- Peru, at 34.3% against 27.9% in Mexico as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Mexico and Peru?
- 6.4%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Mexico and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Mexico ranks 27th and Peru ranks 24th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group