Kyrgyzstan vs Vietnam: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Kyrgyzstan
42.4%
in 2020
Vietnam
44.8%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
21st
Vietnam rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Vietnam
How they compare
Vietnam currently reports 44.8% against 42.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Vietnam's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Vietnam ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st and Vietnam ranks 20th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Vietnam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.7% | 54.8% | 27.1% | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 47.4% | 45.8% | 1.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 42.4% | 44.8% | 2.4% | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Kyrgyzstan or Vietnam?
- Vietnam, at 44.8% against 42.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam?
- 2.4%, with Vietnam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st and Vietnam ranks 20th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group