Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Costa Rica
41.4%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
39.5%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
19th
Kyrgyzstan rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 41.4% against 39.5% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 19th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 36.7% | 39.4% | 2.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 45.2% | 39.5% | 5.7% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Costa Rica, at 41.4% against 39.5% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.9%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Costa Rica ranks 19th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group