Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Armenia
36.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
39.5%
in 2020
Armenia rank
24th
Kyrgyzstan rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 39.5% against 36.6% in Armenia, a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 24th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.0% | 39.3% | 5.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 39.1% | 39.5% | 0.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 39.5% against 36.6% in Armenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.9%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Armenia ranks 24th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group