Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance
Chile
17.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
13.2%
in 2020
Chile rank
9th
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 17.2% against 13.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 4.0%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 9th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.6% | 8.9% | 5.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 6.7% | 13.7% | 7.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 12.4% | 13.2% | 0.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Chile, at 17.2% against 13.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 4.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance?
- Chile ranks 9th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group