Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance
Ecuador
17.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
14.9%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
13th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 17.9% against 14.9% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.0% | 13.0% | 1.1% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 16.3% | 14.9% | 1.3% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ecuador, at 17.9% against 14.9% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.0%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance?
- Ecuador ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group