Armenia vs Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash
Armenia
27.3%
in 2022
Belarus
27.6%
in 2019
Armenia rank
4th
Belarus rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Armenia
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 27.6% against 27.3% in Armenia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 4th and Belarus ranks 3rd of 26 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.0% | 12.7% | 10.3% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 23.7% | 33.3% | 9.6% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Armenia or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 27.6% against 27.3% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Armenia and Belarus?
- 0.3%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Belarus?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Belarus rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Armenia ranks 4th and Belarus ranks 3rd of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group