Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash
Kyrgyzstan
17.7%
in 2020
Poland
26.3%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
8th
Poland rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 26.3% against 17.7% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 8.6%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.5 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Poland ranks 5th of 25 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.1% | 13.8% | 2.6% | Poland |
| 2010s | 16.4% | 20.0% | 3.6% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 26.3% against 17.7% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 8.6%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Poland ranks 5th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group