Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash
Armenia
26.0%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
17.7%
in 2020
Armenia rank
6th
Kyrgyzstan rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 26.0% against 17.7% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 8.3%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.5 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th of 25 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.8% | 15.6% | 8.2% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 41.7% | 17.7% | 24.0% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Armenia, at 26.0% against 17.7% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8.3%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Armenia ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group