Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash
Costa Rica
21.0%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
19.2%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
8th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 21.0% against 19.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 24 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.7% | 14.8% | 0.9% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 43.9% | 19.2% | 24.7% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Costa Rica, at 21.0% against 19.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.8%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Costa Rica ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group