Armenia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash
Armenia
32.2%
in 2022
Poland
33.7%
in 2019
Armenia rank
4th
Poland rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 33.7% against 32.2% in Armenia, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 4th and Poland ranks 3rd of 24 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.9% | 14.0% | 8.9% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 23.3% | 18.3% | 5.0% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 33.7% against 32.2% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Armenia and Poland?
- 1.5%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Armenia ranks 4th and Poland ranks 3rd of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group