Ecuador vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Ecuador
43.0%
in 2022
South Africa
49.3%
in 2021
Ecuador rank
13th
South Africa rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 49.3% against 43.0% in Ecuador, a difference of 6.3%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 11th of 27 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.7% | 50.0% | 23.3% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 26.2% | 50.4% | 24.2% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Ecuador or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 49.3% against 43.0% in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 6.3%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Ecuador ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 11th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group