Ecuador vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Ecuador
43.0%
in 2022
Serbia
33.7%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
13th
Serbia rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 43.0% against 33.7% in Serbia, a difference of 9.3%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 15th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 27.7% | 50.4% | 22.7% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 38.7% | 37.2% | 1.5% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Ecuador, at 43.0% against 33.7% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 9.3%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Ecuador ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 15th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group