Costa Rica vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Costa Rica
23.8%
in 2022
Peru
21.1%
in 2022
Costa Rica rank
19th
Peru rank
22nd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Costa Rica
- Peru
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 23.8% against 21.1% in Peru, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 19th and Peru ranks 22nd of 27 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.0% | 32.0% | 15.0% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 23.1% | 19.6% | 3.6% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 28.0% | 20.3% | 7.7% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Costa Rica or Peru?
- Costa Rica, at 23.8% against 21.1% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Costa Rica and Peru?
- 2.7%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Peru?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Costa Rica and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Costa Rica ranks 19th and Peru ranks 22nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group